
A criminal conviction can change everything—your freedom, your future, and your family. We are one of the few firms in Georgia focusing solely on criminal appeals and post-conviction relief.
Inflexible deadlines apply. Start your review today.
Admitted to Practice In
Even when a case is complex, the appeal timeline usually begins immediately after sentencing. Knowing your window is the critical first step.
30 days
Due within 30 days after entry of judgment. Exception: May shift if a motion for new trial is filed.
14 days
Due within 14 days after entry of judgment in federal criminal cases. There is almost no margin for delay.
Years
Typically 4 years for Georgia State Habeas, and 1 year for Federal Habeas from when conviction becomes final.

The appellate court reviews what happened in the trial court to determine whether legal errors occurred—and whether those errors require relief. Not every error leads to a reversal.
You believe the judge made harmful legal rulings, or the process violated the law in a way that truly matters to the outcome.
Your sentence may not be authorized under Georgia law, or may involve legal errors in enhancements or conditions imposed by the judge.
If constitutional rights (Fourth, Fifth, Sixth Amendments) affected the fairness of the proceedings, appellate review is appropriate.
Some plea-related issues can be appealable, but they are very narrow and fact-specific. We can evaluate the record to see if grounds exist.

Georgia's Leading Specialist in Post-Conviction Litigation
Mark Yurachek has focused his work on criminal appeals and post-conviction litigation for over two decades. Clients and trial lawyers seek Mark's counsel when the record matters, deadlines are tight, and the case requires strict appellate discipline.
Appellate work is fundamentally different from trial advocacy. It requires digesting massive records, identifying precise legal errors, and writing persuasive briefs that judges actually read.
Mark has handled hundreds of appeals and habeas corpus petitions in state and federal courts, built on a deep understanding of procedural nuance and exhaustive record review.
Every case is unique, but our strategic approach ensures every potential avenue for relief is thoroughly evaluated before the court.
Gather charges, dates, filings to see if deadlines allow an appeal.
Obtaining transcripts, exhibits, and orders. Appeals rise or fall on the record.
Disciplined strategy to select strong arguments without drowning them in weak ones.
Filing persuasive briefs. If granted, presenting oral arguments.
Reversal, new trial, resentencing, or evaluation of further post-conviction options.
Not every error leads to relief. Appellate courts look for preserved objections, the standard of review, and whether the error likely affected the outcome. Here is what we regularly review for.
Whether the court improperly admitted harmful evidence or excluded helpful defense evidence.
Incorrect instructions—or refusal to give a requested charge—affecting how the jury understood the law.
Misconduct that fundamentally undermines the fairness of the trial and output.
Unlawful searches/seizures, coerced statements, or ineffective assistance of counsel.
When the court limits cross-examination or allows hearsay that prevents confronting accusers.
Errors in applying enhancements, consecutive rules, or exceeding legal standards.
"Mark was communicative throughout the process, and he really cared about my case and getting results. He kept all expectations grounded in reality. This is the guy you want on your side!"
Kalen